USPTO serial 76659784
OXYTHERM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELZER, LYDIA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OXYTHERM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Carrollton, TX
Carrollton, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stanley R. Moore
Stanley R. Moore Winstead PCP.O. Box 50784Dallas, TX 75250-0784UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical products, namely, thermal therapy and oxygenation system for localized treatment of a patient's wound, comprised of thermal fluid temperature control module and thermal patient wrap and oxygen generator module and patient treatment pad | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 6, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |