USPTO serial 76659854
WATERMARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WATERMARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. Scarbrough
James E. Scarbrough FAY SHARPE LLP1228 Euclid AvenueThe Halle Building, 5th FloorCleveland, OH 44115Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | PRODUCTS USED FOR MAINTAINING SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, NAMELY, LEAF SKIMMERS, DRAIN COVERS, SIPHONS, AND STRUCTURAL PARTS FOR POOL AND SPA SKIMMERS, NAMELY, DOORS, BASKETS, COVERS, PLUGS, WEIRS, AND DIVERTERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | PRODUCTS USED IN MAINTAINING SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, NAMELY, ADHESIVE TAPE FOR USE WITH SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | PRODUCTS USED IN MAINTAINING SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, NAMELY, NON-METAL COPING, BEAD RECEIVERS; FITTED SWIMMING POOL COVERS; FITTED SWIMMING POOL COVER ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, CHAFING STRIPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | PRODUCTS USED IN MAINTAINING SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, NAMELY, NON-METAL CLIPS FOR USE IN MAINTAINING SWIMMING POOLS, HAND-OPERATED NON-METAL POOL HOSE REELS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fowler Products Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Fowler Products Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named WATERMARK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 7, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |