USPTO serial 76660164
WHAT REALLY HAPPENED?
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHAT REALLY HAPPENED??
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Henry M. Bissell
Henry M. Bissell Bissell Law Office6321 Riggs PlaceLos Angeles, CA 90045UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely producing screenplays for television audiences | ACTIVE | May 15, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 12, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |