USPTO serial 76660342
ROVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEWPORT BEACH, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer Software for communicating with users of hand-held computers; computer software for wireless content delivery; mobile computing and operating platforms consisting of data transceivers, wireless networks and gateways for collection and management of data | ACTIVE | Apr 3, 2006 |
| 038 | electronic transmission of messages and data | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Apr 3, 2006 |
| 042 | application Service Provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications for others to access | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Apr 3, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |