USPTO serial 76660394
PERCHERON DURABLE DINNERWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3737266Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 12, 2010
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, ROBERT JAMES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PERCHERON DURABLE DINNERWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | cutlery, namely, knives, forks, and spoons made of plastic | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 15, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JAH Innovations Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by JAH Innovations Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by JAH Innovations Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named PERCHERON DURABLE DINNERWARE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 12, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | PGSU | PETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2008 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |