Drawing for SIMPLE SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 76660456

SIMPLE SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIMPLE SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer S. Sickler

JENNIFER S SICKLER GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP3000 THANKSGIVING TWR1601 ELM STDALLAS, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Slipcovers, namely, fitted fabric covers for sofas, love seats, recliners, sectionals, ottomans, and chairs; fitted dining room chair covers; and fitted covers for pillows and cushionsACTIVE—
024Slipcovers, namely, unfitted fabric covers for sofas, love seats, recliners, sectionals, ottomans, and chairs; unfitted dining room chair covers; and unfitted covers for pillows and cushionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 6, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 27, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 9, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 18, 2008RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 18, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 5, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 5, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 4, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 4, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 28, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 31, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 31, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2006MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 31, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance