USPTO serial 76661134
BUT AS FOR ME, I WILL WALK IN MY INTEGRITY.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3799836Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 8, 2010
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BUT AS FOR ME, I WILL WALK IN MY INTEGRITY.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CHERRY HILL, NJ
CHERRY HILL, NJ
CHERRY HILL, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing seminars in the field of ethics; providing one-on-one and small group coaching services to individuals and small groups in the field of ethics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 28, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DOUGLAS, RALPH E.
- Other trademarks owned by DOUGLAS, RALPH E.
- Other trademarks owned by DOUGLAS, RALPH E.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named BUT AS FOR ME, I WILL WALK IN MY INTEGRITY.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 7, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 21, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |