USPTO serial 76661176
PRINCETON CONSULTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBRAY, KATHERINE M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRINCETON CONSULTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Koramangala, Bangalore - 560095, IN
BANGALORE, IN
BANGALORE, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul F. Kilmer
PAUL F. KILMER HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP2099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 100WASHINGTON, DC 20006-6801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer software consulting services in the field of the design, selection, implementation and use of computer software for technology and operations outsourcing; developing, updating and maintaining of computer software for others; testing of computer software for others; software engineering; designing, creating, maintaining and hosting web sites for others; development and management of computer networks; product research and development; development of computer software applications in the field of customer relationship management, multi-channel customer contact centers, customer operations improvement, data and application integration and customer data analysis and segmentation; computer software application development services;development, testing, deployment and support services for technology product companies, namely, computer software implementation services for others consisting of computer system deployment, modification, design and development of software, software configuration, data migration, project management and technical support services; custom design of business management computer networks; design of computerized information systems relating to customer relationship management; design and technical support of project management, namely, computer project management services | ABANDONED | May 5, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 8, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 8, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 8, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |