USPTO serial 76661311
R-MAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORNDORFF, LINDA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with R-MAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan F. Meckstroth
ALAN F MECKSTROTH JACOX, MECKSTROTH & JENKINS2310 FAR HILLS BLDGDAYTON, OH 45419-1575UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | power operated cutting tools, namely boring tools and reamers | ABANDONED | Apr 16, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 3, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 3, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |