USPTO serial 76661566
CONSEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 27, 2008
- Examiner
- BELZER, LYDIA M
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with CONSEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Conseal International Incorporated
Norwood, MA, US
Other trademarks owned by Conseal International Incorporated
Conseal International Incorporated
Norwood, MA, US
Other trademarks owned by Conseal International Incorporated
Conseal International Incorporated
Norwood, MA, US
Other trademarks owned by Conseal International Incorporated
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James David Johnson
CONSEAL INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED90 KERRY PLACE, SUITE 2NORWOOD, MD 02062UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | WATER-BASED SEALANTS FOR USE IN CONCRETE AND MASONRY APPLICATIONS SUCH AS MANHOLES, CONCRETE VAULTS, SEPTIC TANKS, CONCRETE PIPE, BOX CULVERTS, UTILITY VAULTS, BURIAL VAULTS, VERTICAL PANEL STRUCTURES, WALLS, FLOORS, BRIDGES, DECKS, AND DOCKS | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Conseal International Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Conseal International Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Conseal International Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named CONSEAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2026 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 8, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 8, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 29, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2018 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 27, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |