Drawing for VANGUARD

USPTO serial 76661672

VANGUARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3411277Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 15, 2008
Examiner
LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with VANGUARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROSLYN Y. BAZZELLE

ROSLYN Y. BAZZELLE WEYCER, KAPLAN, PULASKI & ZUBER PC11 GREENWAY PLAZA SUITE 1400HOUSTON, TX 77046UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Metal-working machinery and power-operated tools, namely, vertical machining centers, computer numerical controlled bridge type vertical machining centers, computer numerical controlled gantry type vertical machining centers, computer numerical controlled c-frame type vertical machining centers, computer numerical controlled drilling machines, horizontal machining centers, computer numerical controlled vertical boring mills, computer numerical controlled planer type horizontal boring mills, computer numerical controlled floor type horizontal boring mills, computer numerical controlled lathes, computer numerical controlled flat bed lathes, computer numerical controlled slant bed lathes, computer numerical controlled multi function lathes, computer numerical controlled oil country lathes, computer numerical controlled verticallathes, computer numerical controlled grinding machines, computer numerical controlled gearmachines, computer numerical controlled universal cylindrical grinders, computer numerical controlled plain cylindrical grinders, conventional vertical boring mills, conventional horizontal boring mills, conventional lathes, conventional engine lathes, conventional heavy duty engine lathes, conventional horizontal milling machines, conventional vertical milling machines, conventional radial drills, computer numerical controlled burning tables for flame cutting machines to cut shapes and patterns out of steel plate, computer numerical controlled gantry machines, computer numerical controlled flame cutting machines, computer numerical controlled pipe intersection machines for angle cutting pipe sections, fabricating machinery, welding positioners for positioning and turning parts for welding, welding manipulators, adjustable turning rolls for positioning cylindrical parts for welding, self aligning turning rolls, plate equipment for cutting steel plate, beam equipment for welding together beams, saws, horizontal bandsaws, semiautomatic horizontal bandsaws, automatic horizontal bandsaws, vertical bandsaws, vertical plate saws, circular saws, miter saws, cleaning machines for cleaning metal parts by shot and sand blasting, coating machines for application of protective coating after parts are cleaned, and chucks for holding parts in place while being machinedACTIVEJul 1, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2018NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2018RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jan 2, 201889AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Dec 21, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 27, 2017E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2017REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2013NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2013C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 14, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 29, 2013815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 29, 2013E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 26, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 20, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 13, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 11, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 11, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 11, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 11, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 31, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 21, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2006MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance