USPTO serial 76661958
DUAL DIRECTIONAL VIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUAL DIRECTIONAL VIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Adams
Robert W. Adams NIXON & VANDERHYE PC901 N GLEBE RDSTE 1100ARLINGTON, VA 22203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Car navigation apparatus; cellular phones; personal digital assistants; video game machines adapted for use with television receivers only; dvd players; personal computers; video monitors; computer monitors; monitors for commercial use, namely, monitors for displaying various kinds of image, data and information; television receivers; liquid crystal display modules; rear video monitors for cars | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Instrument panels for cars | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Hand-held games with liquid crystal displays other than those adopted for use with television receivers only | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named DUAL DIRECTIONAL VIEW
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 20, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |