USPTO serial 76662070
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John T. Newman
JOHN T NEWMAN HORNBERGER SHEEHAN FULLER & BEITER7373 BROADWAY STE 300SAN ANTONIO, TX 78209-3266UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Newspapers for general circulation | ACTIVE | Jan 21, 2005 |
| 041 | Providing online newspapers and magazines in the fields of entertainment, sports and news IN THE NATURE OF CURRENT EVENT REPORTING; PROVIDING A WEBSITE FEATURING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF ENTERTAINMENT, SPORTS AND NEWS IN THE NATURE OF CURRENT EVENT REPORTING | ACTIVE | Jan 21, 2005 |
| 042 | computer online services, namely, providing a wide range of general interest news and information via a global computer network | ACTIVE | Jan 21, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 4, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |