USPTO serial 76662398
FOOD LOVES CUISIPRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FOOD LOVES CUISIPRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Markham, Ontario, L3R 1E3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James F. McKeown
JAMES F MCKEOWN CROWELL & MORING LLPPO BOX 14300WASHINGTON, DC 20044-4300UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Measuring utensils, namely, measuring spoons, measuring cups, and measuring beakers; magnets | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Pans, spring form pans, and bundform pans; barware, namely, coasters, shot glasses, and cocktail shakers; stainless steel and copper mixing bowls; colanders;jugs, namely, cappuccino steamers and juice servers; fondue sets, namely, pots,burners, candles, fondue burner fuel, and forks; fondue condiment sets, namely, ceramic jars, spoons, and wire racks; food preparation equipment, namely, food mills, food mill disks, potato mashers, potato ricers, French fry cutters, rotary cheese graters, shredder drums, rotary herb graters, plane graters, plane shredders, parmesan graters, six-sided graters, and four-sided graters; scoops, namely, ice cream scoops, cookie dough scoops, and coffee measure scoops; food storage vessels, namely, canisters, spice shakers, salt and pepper shakers; mesh strainers, conical strainers; kitchen utensils, namely, serving tongs, utility tongs, spatulas, pie servers, turners, sandwich spreaders, dough scrapers, cake servers, griddle scrapers, skimmers, spaghetti servers, ladles, gravy ladles, garlic presses, melon ballers, utensil hanging rails and hooks, pastry brushes, rubber bowl scrapers, non-electric, hand-held citrus juicers and squeezers, splatter guards, trivets, chafing dishes, tea infusers, canning funnels, pastry blenders, potato mashers, meat pounders, soap dishes, paper towel holders, flexible Swedish whisks, piano whisks, balloon whisks, jug whisks, flat whisks, egg whisks, rolling pins, wooden spoons, wooden spatulas; tea pots not of precious metal, water pitchers, gravy boats, and cheese shakers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |