USPTO serial 76662454
PEISELER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 24, 2009
- Examiner
- IM, JEAN H
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with PEISELER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Remscheid, DE
D-42855 Remscheid, DE
D-42855 Remscheid, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica L. Olson
Jessica L. Olson OPPEDAHL PATENT LAW FIRM LLCP O Box 351240Westminster, CO 80035UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES AND MACHINE TOOLS FOR THE CUTTING AND FORMING OF MATERIALS, NAMELY, ROTARY TABLES, INDEXING TABLES, TRUNNION TABLES, ROTARY-TILT TABLES, DIRECT DRIVE TABLES, SHUTTLE TABLES, NUMERICAL CONTROL ROTARY TABLES, NUMERICAL CONTROL SPINDLE POSITIONERS, HIRTH COUPLINGS, TOOL CHANGERS; PLANETARY SYSTEMS FOR WORKPIECE TRANSPORT AND POSITIONING CONSISTING OF A CARRIER INDEXING TABLE WITH A DIVISIONAL PITCH CONSISTENT WITH THE NUMBER OF PLANETS, PLANETS FOR THE POSITIONING OF WORKPIECES UNDER THE WORK SPINDLES MOUNTED ON A CARRIER TABLE DIAL PLATE, PLANETS OF IDENTICAL DESIGN LOCATED AT EACH DIVISIONAL PITCH LOCATION AND CAPABLE OF OPERATING INDEPENDENTLY, WHEREIN THE PLANETS ARE CAPABLE OF OPERATING DURING A CARRIER TABLE INDEXING MOTION, AND A CENTRAL MANIFOLD FOR SUPPLYING MEDIA FOR POWER TRANSMISSION TO EACH PLANET AND WORKPIECE FIXTURE; SATELLITE SYSTEMS FOR WORKPIECE TRANSPORT AND POSITIONING CONSISTING OF A CARRIER INDEXING TABLE WITH A DIVISIONAL PITCH CONSISTENT WITH THE NUMBER OF WORK STATIONS, LOADING AND UNLOADING STATIONS, FIXTURES FOR CHUCKING AND MANIPULATING WORKPIECES MOUNTED ON THE CARRIER TABLE DIAL PLATE AND UNDER THE WORK SPINDLES, STATIONARY SATELLITE DRIVERS ENGAGING WITH THE FIXTURES MOUNTED ON THE CARRIER TABLE DIAL PLATE FOR MANIPULATING THE WORKPIECE UNDER THE WORK SPINDLE, WHEREIN SATELLITES ARE NOT REQUIRED AT ALL WORK STATIONS OR AT THE LOAD AND UNLOAD STATIONS, WHEREIN SATELLITES ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE OF AN IDENTICAL DESIGN, WHEREIN SATELLITE FIXTURES CANNOT MANIPULATE THE WORKPIECE DURING THE CARRIER TABLE INDEXING MOTION, WHEREIN A CENTRAL MANIFOLD TO THE SUPPLY MEDIA FOR POWER TRANSMISSION TO EACH SATELLITE DRIVER IS NOT REQUIRED, AS THE SATELLITE DRIVERS ARE STATIONARY | ACTIVE | Aug 16, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 10, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 9, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 22, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |