USPTO serial 76662543
LE CABRIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LE CABRIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rolling Hills Estates, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald M. Goldman
RONALD M GOLDMAN ROTH & GOLDMAN PA21535 HAWTHORNE BLVD STE 500TORRANCE, CA 90503-6619UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Brie style cheese made from goat milk | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |