USPTO serial 76662990
BATTLE BEASTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BATTLE BEASTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tokyo, 124-8511, JP
Tokyo, 124-8511, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William F. Herbert
WILLIAM F HERBERT STAAS & HALSEY LLP1201 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20005-6129UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | WAX FOR SKIS; AMUSEMENT MACHINES AND APPARATUS FOR USE IN AMUSEMENT PARKS OTHER THAN ARCADE VIDEO GAME MACHINES, NAMELY COIN-OPERATED AMUSEMENT MACHINES; TOYS FOR DOMESTIC PETS, TOYS, NAMELY, PUZZLES, BOARD GAMES, TOY CARS, RACING TRACK FOR TOY CARS AND PARTS THEREFORE, DIE-CAST MINIATURE CARS, DIORAMA TOYS, DIE-CAST MINIATURE SHIPS, DIE-CAST MINIATURE AIRPLANES AND WIRELESS-CONTROLLED TOYS; DOLLS; UTAGARUTA (JAPANESE PLAYING CARDS); SHOGI GAMES (JAPANESE CHESS); DICE; SUGOROKU (JAPANESE DICE GAMES); CUPS FOR DICE; CHESS GAMES; CHECKERS; DOMINOES; PLAYING CARDS; HANAFUDA (JAPANESE PLAYING CARDS); MAH-JONG; GAME MACHINES AND APPARATUS, NAMELY PINBALL MACHINES, LOTTERY WHEELS; BILLIARD EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, BILLIARD BALLS AND CUES; SPORTS EQUIPMENT, NAMELY BASEBALL BATS, BASEBALL GLOVES, BASKETBALLS; FISHING TACKLE, AND INSECT COLLECTING HOBBY KITS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 3, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |