USPTO serial 76663086
TECH TOOLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TECH TOOLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Myron Amer
MYRON AMER MYRON AMER PC114 OLD COUNTRY RD STE 310MINEOLA, NY 11501-4410UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | retail store hand-held battery-operated flashlight, namely, a flashlight providing a beam of light for the enhanced visibility of the user | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 22, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |