USPTO serial 76663341
SECUREX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRAZIER, TAMARA G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SECUREX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert G. Lev
ROBERT G LEV LEV INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONSULTING4766 MICHIGAN BLVDYOUNGSTOWN, OH 44505UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | security fencing systems, namely, metal gates and fencing panels | ACTIVE | Nov 16, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 18, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |