USPTO serial 76663561
VILLA HOTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3396597Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 11, 2008
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VILLA HOTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric Vaughn Flam
LARRY LANGER163 BAYBERRY LANEWESTPORT, CT 06880UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Private residence club services, namely, provision to club members of temporary accommodations in company owned or leased private residences, namely, luxury vacation properties located worldwide | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2011 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |