USPTO serial 76663655
THAT'S AMORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THAT'S AMORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London W1U 2HA, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James V. Costigan
James V. Costigan HEDMAN & COSTIGAN, P.C.1230 Avenue of the Americas, 7th FloorNew York, NY 10020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Ladies, gents' and children's clothing, namely, shirts, blouses, skirts, jackets, trousers; shorts, vests; jerseys; pajamas; stockings; singlets; clothing corsets; garter belts; pants; bras; petty-coats; slipper; shoe-wear in general, namely, slippers, shoes, sports shoes, boots and sandals; welts for boots and shoes; walking shoes; training shoes; synthetic rubber shoe soles shoes for men; shoes for casual wear; shoes adapted for wear by athletes; running shoes; and shoe inserts of non-metallic materials for primarily non-orthopedic purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |