USPTO serial 76663727
GOURMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOURMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC E. GISOLFI
ERIC E GISOLFI SABIN, BERMANT & GOULD LLPFOUR TIMES SQNEW YORK, NY 10036-6526UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others by distribution and transmission of advertisements in the nature of audio text messages and emails and emails via wireless and mobile devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Transmission of information through video and audio digital networks and electronic communications | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Providing information in the fields of food, beverages, cooking, baking, recipes and restaurant devices, arts, politics and popular culture via wireless mobile devices, satellite, cable and global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Advance Magazine Publishers Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Advance Magazine Publishers Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named GOURMET
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |