USPTO serial 76663755
MODERN BRIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MODERN BRIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
The Conde Nast Bridal Group Inc.
New York, NY
ADVANCE MAGAZINE PUBLISHERS INC.
NEW YORK, NY
ADVANCE MAGAZINE PUBLISHERS INC.
NEW YORK, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC E. GISOLFI
ERIC E GISOLFI SABIN, BERMANT & GOULD LLPFOUR TIMES SQUARENEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others via wireless and mobile devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Transmission of information via wireless and mobile devices, satellite and cable and other means of digital and electronic transmissions; transmission of information via digital networks and electronic communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Conde Nast Bridal Group Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ADVANCE MAGAZINE PUBLISHERS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ADVANCE MAGAZINE PUBLISHERS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named MODERN BRIDE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 7, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 1, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |