Drawing for OUIJA

USPTO serial 76663879

OUIJA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OUIJA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kurt R. Benson

PAUL N VANASSE HASBRO INC1027 NEWPORT AVEPAWTUCKET, RI 02862UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, production and distribution of movies and television game showsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 18, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 3, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 2, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 25, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 25, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 19, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 18, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 18, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 3, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 19, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 11, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 11, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 27, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 27, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 26, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 6, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 25, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 12, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2006MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 4, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance