USPTO serial 76663950
PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3295825Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 18, 2007
- Examiner
- BEYER, ELIZABETH L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Myron Amer
PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.71 Grace AvenueGreat Neck, NY 11021UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Environmental remediation services, namely oil reclamation services by using an assembly of machinery, namely, a mesh strainer and high surface filter, a pump, a low-watt density heater, a pressure-switch gauge, a valve, a liquid-gas separation column, a condenser, a condensate collection chamber with a level control switch and a vacuum discharge pump, to treat hydraulic and industrial oils | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 18, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 18, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |