Drawing for PETROTECH

USPTO serial 76663951

PETROTECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEYER, ELIZABETH L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PETROTECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer

Myron Amer Myron Amer, P.C.350 National BlvdSuite 2BLong Beach, NY 11561-3327

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Oil reclamation machinery, namely, oil separatory system comprised of a mesh strainer and high surface filter, a pump, a low-watt density heater, a pressure-switch gauge, a valve, a liquid-gas separation column, a condenser, a condensate collection chamber with a level control switch and a vacuum discharge pump to treat hydraulic and industrial oilsACTIVEJan 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 27, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 27, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 23, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 1, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 28, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 2, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 2, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 1, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 10, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jul 10, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 21, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 15, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 4, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 1, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 2, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2006MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 7, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance