USPTO serial 76664335
TEMPTROLL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEMPTROLL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Munday
John S. Munday KINNEY & LANGE, P.A.The Kinney & Lange Building312 South Third StreetMinneapolis, MN 55415-1002Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Donovan Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Donovan Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named TEMPTROLL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 20, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 1, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 1, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |