USPTO serial 76665500
WPRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3738469Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 19, 2010
- Examiner
- TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WPRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Esplugues de Llobregat/ Barcelona, ES
Esplugues de Llobregat/ Barcelona, ES
Esplugues de Llobregat/ Barcelona, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Horst M. Kasper
13 Forest DriveWarren, NJ 07059UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | ELECTRIC AND NON-MANICURE AND CHIROPODY CASES, NAMELY, ELECTRIC AND NON- ELECTRIC MANICURE IMPLEMENTS, NAMELY, NAIL CLIPPERS, NAIL FILES, NAIL PINCERS, NAIL SCISSORS, AND SHORT NAIL SKINS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | ELECTRIC DEVICES FOR REMOVING MAKE UP; ELECTRIC AND ELECTROCHEMICAL IRONS FOR HAIR, NAMELY, ELECTRIC AND ELECTROCHEMICAL HAIR CURLING IRONS, ELECTRIC AND ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICES FOR HAIR CURLING AND WAVING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | STATIONARY HAIR DRIERS FOR COMMERCIAL AND DOMESTIC USE, FACIAL VAPORIZATION DEVICES, NAMELY, SAUNAS, HAIRDRESSER STERILIZERS AND DEVICES FOR DISINFECTIONS; ELECTRIC HOT HAIR HAND DRYERS FOR WASH ROOM, HAIRDRESSER SANITARY DEVICES AND EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, HAIRDRESSER SANITARY DEVICES AND EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, HAIRDRESSER STERILIZERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Winsor Corporation S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Winsor Corporation S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Winsor Corporation S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named WPRO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |