USPTO serial 76665596
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Washington Square Associates, Inc.
Alexandria, VA
Other trademarks owned by Washington Square Associates, Inc.
Washington Square Associates, Inc.
Alexandria, VA
Other trademarks owned by Washington Square Associates, Inc.
Washington Square Associates, Inc.
Stafford, VA
Other trademarks owned by Washington Square Associates, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC J. VON VORYS
ERIC J. VON VORYS SHULMAN, ROGERS, GANDAL, PORDY & ECKER12505 PARK POTOMAC AVENUESIXTH FLOORPOTOMAC, MD 20854| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Management consulting services, namely, consulting services for the management of databases and logistical information; Computer system procurement, namely, procuring computer system for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 1995 |
| 042 | Computer system development for others; Computer systems software and multimedia application design and development for others; Computer services, namely, creating, implementing and maintaining web pages and web sites for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 1995 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 10, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | RSHG | REQUEST FOR SPECIAL HANDLING - GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | RFSH | REQUEST FOR SPECIAL HANDLING RECEIVED | — |