USPTO serial 76665636
SYSTEM CENTER BASED SECURITY SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 10, 2008
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SYSTEM CENTER BASED SECURITY SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig R. Miles
CRAIG R MILES CR MILES PC1 OLD TOWN SQ STE 200BFORT COLLINS, CO 80524-2472UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software to monitor and audit computer hardware and software for compliance with applicable federal laws and regulations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 25, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | โ |
| Jun 10, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| May 7, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Apr 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Apr 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Apr 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Apr 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Apr 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Apr 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Apr 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | โ |
| Apr 17, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | โ |
| Mar 28, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline โ usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline โ usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | โ |
| Aug 27, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2007 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | โ |
| Aug 27, 2007 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | โ |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | โ |
| Aug 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | โ |
| Aug 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Aug 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Jul 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Jan 30, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Jan 11, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Sep 16, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | โ |
| Sep 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |