USPTO serial 76665723
LINGHAM'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LINGHAM'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Palos Verdes, CA
Palos Verdes, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harpreet S. Walia
Harpreet S. Walia Walial Law Offices1840 Gateway DriveSuite 200San Mateo, CA 94404Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | cakes; cheese flavored snacks; cheese cake; Chinese rice noodles; Chinese noodles with vegetables; Chinese steamed dumplings; Chinese stuffed dumplings; chutney; cookies; curry dumpling; egg rolls; frozen packaged entrees consisting primarily of rice; puffed pastry with vegetable curry; risotto; potstickers; prepared pizza; pastries; ketchup; ice cream; fruit pies; coffee; chocolate cakes; beverages made of coffee; beverages made of tea; bakery goods; bakery desserts; tea; pasta; allspice; almond cake; almond paste; artichoke sauce; baking powder; baking soda; baking spices; bread crumbs; cannelloni; custards; file; filo dough; popped popcorn; gnocchi; chili sauces; chili paste for use of seasoning; curry powder; spices; and salad dressings, namely vinaigrette | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2007 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |