USPTO serial 76665746
VIP PASSPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIP PASSPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William Archer
William Archer LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP221 N FIGUEROA ST STE 1200LOS ANGELES, CA 90012-2639UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRERECORDED AUDIO AND VIDEO CASSETTES, COMPACT DISCS, VIDEO DISCS, RECORDS, AND CD-ROMS, ALL OF THE FOREGOING FEATURING SHOWS ABOUT LUXURY LIFESTYLE AND TRAVEL; VIDEO GAME TAPES OR DISKS WITH ANIMATION; VIDEO GAME MACHINE THAT IS ADAPTED OR INTENDED FOR USE WITH A TELEVISION, MONITOR OR EXTERNAL DISPLAY SCREEN WHICH IS SEPARATE FROM THE VIDEO GAME MACHINE; COMPUTER GAME EQUIPMENT CONTAINING MEMORY DEVICES, NAMELY, DISCS; INTERACTIVE VIDEO GAME PROGRAMS; MAGNETICALLY ENCODED PRE-PAID TELEPHONE DEBIT CARDS; MAGNETS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE DOWNLOADED FROM A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; EYEGLASSES AND SUNGLASSES; GAMING MACHINES; GAMING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, SLOT MACHINES WITH OR WITHOUT VIDEO OUTPUT | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF A CONTINUING LUXURY LIFESTYLE AND TRAVEL TELEVISION SHOW, THEATER PRODUCTIONS AND SWEEPSTAKES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lux Entertainment, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Lux Entertainment, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named VIP PASSPORT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 20, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 14, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 14, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |