USPTO serial 76666026
SIMPLE SEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIMPLE SEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheldon S. Lazarovitz
SHELDON S LAZAROVITZ31 WESTGATE BLVDTORONTO, ON M3H 1N8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | adhesive bandages for wounds, medical or surgical use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |