USPTO serial 76666176
FEEL GOOD AMERICAN ESSENTIALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FEEL GOOD AMERICAN ESSENTIALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen M. O'Neill
Stephen M. O'Neill, Esq. Stephen M. O'Neill Esq. PLLC707 West Delavan AvenueBuffalo, NY 14222UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, legwear, namely, hosiery, socks, leggings, tights, pantyhose, stockings, gaiters and trouser socks; loungewear and sleepwear, namely, robes, caftans and kimonos; underwear, lingerie; pants, jeans, shorts; shirts, namely, dress shirts, T-shirts, polo shirts, turtlenecks, casual shirts, sweat shirts, knit shirts, blouses, tops; sweaters, cardigans; dresses, skirts, body stockings; suits, jackets, sport jackets, vests; neckwear, namely, ties, scarves, bow ties, dickies and neck warmers; cummerbunds; formal wear, namely, tuxedos, gowns, wedding gowns; activewear and fleecewear, namely, sweat shirts, sweat pants, sweat suits, track suits; exercise clothing, namely, tights, shorts, tops, headbands, body suits, leotards, wrist bands; fur coats and stoles; jackets and vests; coats and top coats; ski wear; rainwear, namely, raincoats; headwear, namely, caps, hats, toques, knitted hats, headbands, ear muffs, balaclavas, bandannas, baseball caps and visors; mufflers, scarves; mittens, gloves; footwear, namely, shoes, slippers, boots; swimwear; beachwear, namely, robes, hats, sun visors, cover-ups, sarongs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |