Drawing for EATING RIGHT

USPTO serial 76666322

EATING RIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EATING RIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jordan S. Weinstein

JORDAN S WEINSTEIN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3451UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Full line of meats; full line of poultry; full line of processed vegetables; full line of processed, canned, dried, or preserved fruits; full line of frozen, prepared or packaged entrees and meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; full line of dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; full line of dairy-based beverages; full line of fish not live; full line of fruit-based organic food bars, snack foods and spreads; soy chips; potato crisps; full line of oils for cooking; full line of oils for food; margarine; full line of snack dips excluding salsa and other sauces used as dips; full line of snack mixes consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and raisins; full line of soups; prepared salads except macaroni, rice and pasta salad; fruit preserves; hummus; cheese; soy, turkey and veggie burger patties; chili; and potato saladACTIVE—
030Full line of frozen, prepared or packaged entrees and meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; full line of pasta; full line of prepared coffee and coffee based beverages; full line of prepared tea and tea-based beverages; full line of bakery goods; full line of baking powders and spices; full line of breakfast cereals, full line of candies; full line of chocolates; full line of food flavorings; full line of flour-based, corn-based or grain-based chips; full line of frozen confections, frozen yogurt, frozen custard and fruit ices; full line of ice creams; full line of herbal food beverages; macaroni and cheese; mixes for bakery goods; noodles, sauce, and seasoning toppings combined in unitary packages; full line of frozen and prepared pizzas; salad dressings; sauces; sandwiches; seasonings; spices; sugar and sugar substitutes; non-organic and non-allergy sensitive cookies; crackers; granola, granola snacks, granola-based snack bars; oatmeal; grain-based food bars also containing dried fruit; muffins; bread and bread products, namely, wraps; tortillas; salsa; prepared macaroni, rice and pasta salads; wafflesACTIVE—
031Full line of fresh vegetables and fruitsACTIVE—
032Full line of fruit beverages and juices, water beverages, soft drinks, energy drinks, iced and frozen fruit beverages and smoothies; sports drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 5, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 27, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 25, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 25, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 25, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 22, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 21, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 17, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 1, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 30, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 24, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 22, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 21, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 23, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 23, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 7, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 17, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 3, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 3, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 2, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 2, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 2, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 31, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 19, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 19, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 30, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2007RECGACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED—
Dec 18, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 6, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 6, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 3, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 13, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 11, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 10, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 1, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2006MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 29, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance