USPTO serial 76666348
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David R. Schaffer
DAVID R SCHAFFER MILES & STOCKBRIDGE PC1751 PINNACLE DR STE 500MCLEAN, VA 22102-3833UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business services, namely, swimming pool management in the nature of pool administration and staffing services, and swimming pool facilities management of technical operations | ACTIVE | Sep 21, 1999 |
| 037 | Swimming pool repair and renovation services; swimming pool cleaning and maintenance services; swimming pool drain cleaning services; and swimming pool winterization services | ACTIVE | Sep 21, 1999 |
| 041 | Swimming pool training services in the nature of lifeguard training, training in administering CPR training for being a pool operator, and swimming lessons; and recreational services in the nature of pools | ACTIVE | Sep 21, 1999 |
| 045 | Swimming pool lifeguarding services | ACTIVE | Sep 21, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |