USPTO serial 76666376
FAB FRIENDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FAB FRIENDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ezra Sutton
EZRA SUTTON EZRA SUTTON PAPLZ 9 BLDG 900 US HWY 9WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | HAIR ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, HAIR CLIPS, PONY TAIL HOLDERS, BARRETTES, AND HEAD BANDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 12, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |