USPTO serial 76666796
ANDERSON WALL SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ANDERSON WALL SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Michael West
R. Michael West Law Offices of R. Michael West1922 21st StreetSacramento, CA 95811UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Contract manufacturing of rough-framed pre-fabricated walls, including pre-cut lumber framing packages, sheathing, metal fasteners and connectors for use therewith, provided solely to general contractors, framing contractors and professional home builders | ABANDONED | Nov 24, 2004 |
| 042 | Design of rough-framed pre-fabricated walls, including pre-cut lumber framing packages, sheathing, metal fasteners and connectors for use therewith, provided solely to general contractors, framing contractors and professional home builders | ABANDONED | Nov 24, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pacific Coast Building Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pacific Coast Building Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ANDERSON WALL SYSTEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |