USPTO serial 76666939
GARLIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3681816Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 15, 2009
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GARLIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Surrey, GB
Richmond, Surrey, GB
Richmond, Surrey, GB
NOTTINGHAM, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Brown
Jeffrey H. Brown Michael Best & Friedrich LLP180 N. Stetson, Suite 2000Chicago, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for the management and monitoring of personal data; apparatus for use in data security control, namely, computer software that encrypts data; apparatus for determining, verifying or validating identity, namely, electronic card readers for identity cards; electronic ID cards for use in security screening | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Advisory services concerning data management services for use in debt collection, namely, advisory services about the use of electronic data collection in the debt collection field; advertising services; business management, consultancy and administration; data management services, namely, monitoring consumer credit reports and providing updates and alerts as to any changes therein | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | Underwriting extended warranty contracts in the field of authorization, authentication, encryption and certification services, used to provide security in electronic transactions and communications, underwriting warranty programs in the field of authorization, authentication, encryption and certification services, used to provide security in electronic transactions and communications; consultancy, information and advisory services relating to the aforesaid; credit bureau and credit agency services; credit screening for credit cards, credit screening for mortgage application purposes; preparation and provision of credit reports; evaluating the creditworthiness of potential borrowers for banks; assessing the credit risk posed by potential borrowers for banks; information services relating to credit provided on-line from a computer database, the Internet, electronic mail, text message or telephone message | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | Consultation in the field of identity theft, namely, advisory services about the use, abuse or theft of personal and financial information, fraud prevention in the field of credit cards, identity validation, namely, personal and financial identity monitoring services; identity verification, namely, providing authentication of personal identification information via secure storage and transmitting such data via the Internet; fraudulent credit application detection services; data management services for use in collecting personal data, namely, electronic data collection for use in the prevention of identity fraud | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Garlik Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Garlik Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Garlik Limited
- Other trademarks owned by EXPERIAN LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named GARLIK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 28, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |