USPTO serial 76667524
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Darin D. Honn
DARIN D HONN SUSSMAN SHANK LLP1000 SW BROADWAY STE 1400PORTLAND, OR 97205-3089UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation services in the fields of marketing, investor relations, public relations, customer relationship management, collecting marketing data, managing vendor relationships, managing supplier relationships, internal company communications and systems, and how to market, offer and sell products and services using a global computer network; database management | ACTIVE | Apr 7, 2005 |
| 042 | Computer consulting services, namely, designing and developing for others computer software, websites, network operating systems and databases; computer software development; network operating systems development; website development; computer systems integration services; hardware and software selection; computer software installation | ACTIVE | Apr 7, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |