USPTO serial 76667662
COOLUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3656215Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 21, 2009
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COOLUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
COLOGNE, DE
50825 Cologne, DE
50825 Cologne, DE
50825 Cologne, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa W. Rosaya
Lisa W. Rosaya Baker & McKenzie LLP452 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10018UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [Metal staging constructions for entertainment productions, namely, grids, roofing grids and props consisting of interconnected aluminum and steel beams, sets in the nature of aluminum and steel staging decks and stage supports] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Video screens; [lasers not for medical purposes;] apparatuses for recording, transmitting and reproducing sounds, namely, [cassette players, CD players,] computer hardware, digital audio players, [DVD players, record players, power amplifiers, sound mixers,] video players; control systems for devices in the entertainment industry consisting of single or multiple programmable controllers (jile) with input and output features or digital devices, remote controls, regulators for video screens, sound transmitting apparatuses, namely, loudspeakers, headphones, microphones; [lasers not for medical purposes, and mechanical stages;] computer software for controlling devices in the entertainment industry, namely, video screens, sound transmitting apparatuses, namely, loudspeakers, headphones, microphones; light installations, fog and froth machines, lasers not for medical purposes, mechanical stages; computer software for editing sound, images and video and for organizing and viewing digital images, photographs and sounds and for use in relation to special effects of images and sounds | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | [Stage light installations in the nature of spotlights; fog machines and froth machines for entertainment purposes] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | [Displaying advertisements for others] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Consultancy services relating to the operation in the nature of repair and installation of machines in the entertainment industry, namely, video screens,sound transmitting apparatuses, light installations, fog and froth machines, [ lasers not for medical purposes, mechanical stages and parts therefore,] namely, control devices, namely, computer hardware and software used for the control of the foregoing equipment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Consultancy services relating to the operation in connection with the rental of machines in the entertainment industry, namely, video screens, sound transmitting apparatuses, light installations, fog and froth machines, [lasers not for medical purposes, mechanical stages and parts therefore, ]namely, control devices, namely, computer hardware and software used for the control of the foregoing equipment; rental of equipment used in the entertainment industry, namely, video screens, sound transmitting apparatuses, light installations, fog and froth machines, [ lasers not for medical purposes, mechanical stages and parts therefore,] namely, control devices, namely, computer hardware and software used for the control of the foregoing equipment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Development of computer software; consultancy services relating to the control devices, namely, computer hardware and software used for the control of the equipment; rental of control devices, namely, computer hardware and software used for the control of video screens, sound transmitting apparatuses, light installations, fog and froth machines, [lasers not for medical purposes, mechanical stages] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COOLUX GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by Hüwel, Jan
- Other trademarks owned by Hüwel, Jan
- Other trademarks owned by Hüwel, Jan
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named COOLUX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 21, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 5, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |