USPTO serial 76668110
VIDEOSOLID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIDEOSOLID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0001, JP
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0001, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yasuo Muramatsu
YASUO MURAMATSU MURAMATSU & ASSOCIATES114 PACIFICA STE 310IRVINE, CA 92618-3329UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Game machines, namely, game machines adapted for use with television receivers; Cameras, namely, cinematographic cameras, digital cameras, and video cameras; Communication terminals, namely, portable telephones, mobile phones, and portable communication terminals in the nature of transceivers and mobile data terminals (MDTs); Computers, namely, desktop computers, notebook computers, and hand-held computers; Programs and software, namely, recorded operating programs and software for game machines, cameras, communication terminals, computers, and computer games, downloadable operating programs and software for game machines, cameras, communication terminals, computers, and computer games; Blank storage media for recording programs and software for video game cartridges, electronic circuits, compact disks, DVDs, magnetic disks, magnetic tapes, semiconductor memories; Electronic publications, namely, electronic publications recorded on computer media and downloadable electronic publications in the nature of magazines and industrial pamphlets in the field of computer games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 29, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 8, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 28, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |