USPTO serial 76668331
INFOCUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARKER, JUSTINE D
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INFOCUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David G. Duckworth
DAVID G. DUCKWORTH DRUMMOND & DUCKWORTH4590 MACARTHUR BLVDSTE 500NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-2028Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | service of examining, analyzing and managing television advertising for television stations, networks and cable systems | ABANDONED | Aug 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |