USPTO serial 76668388
MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3462848Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 8, 2008
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pawtucket, RI
Pawtucket, RI
Pawtucket, RI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL N. VANASSE
PAUL N. VANASSE HASBRO, INC.1027 NEWPORT AVEPAWTUCKET, RI 02862UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Games and playthings, namely, toy action figures; toy vehicles; toy robots convertible into other visual toy forms; board games | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 23, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 12, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |