USPTO serial 76668397
SHIPYARDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHIPYARDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Jacksonville, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil F. Markva
NEIL F MARKVA8322A TRAFORD LNSPRINGFIELD, VA 22152-1638UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant services featuring yacht club dining facilities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |