Drawing for GLAMSLAM

USPTO serial 76668443

GLAMSLAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLAMSLAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pamela A. Rask

PAMELA A RASK C/O SABIN BERMANT & GOULD LLP4 TIMES SQNEW YORK, NY 10036-6518UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting the goods and services of others in the field of apparel, beauty, beverages and cosmetics via wireless and mobile devices and global computer networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 30, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 24, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 9, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 8, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 12, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 12, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 17, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 14, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 23, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 11, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 11, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 27, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 4, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 25, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 24, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 20, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 28, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 24, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 26, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2006MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance