USPTO serial 76669103
CLOUD PEOPLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLOUD PEOPLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN R. GARBER
JOHN R GARBER60 WOODCREST LNDANBURY, CT 06810-7159UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRE-RECORDED CDs, VIDEO TAPES AND DVDs FEATURING MUSIC AND CHILDREN'S STORIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2011 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |