USPTO serial 76669299
ZIVIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZIVIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Guth
MICHAEL A GUTH2-2905 E CLIFF DRSANTA CRUZ, CA 95062UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Consumer electronics and consumer electronics accessories, namely, a wireless headset for use with telephones, cellular telephones, computers, personal audio devices, MP3 players, and parts thereof | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2009 | EX3M | SOU EXTENSION 3 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | EX3D | SOU EXTENSION 3 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 16, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |