USPTO serial 76669385
BEST NEW YORK PIZZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3346375Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 27, 2007
- Examiner
- SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BEST NEW YORK PIZZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward P. Dutkiewicz
EDWARD P DUTKIEWICZ EDWARD P DUTKIEWICZ PAP.O. BOX 937DADE CITY, FL 33526-0937UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Pizza for consumption on and off premises | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 20, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2018 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 11, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2012 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |