USPTO serial 76669945
FACIAL ABUSE FA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FACIAL ABUSE FA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
East Orange, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph D. Obenberger
JOSEPH D OBENBERGER JD OBENBERGER & ASSOCIATES70 W MADISON ST STE 3700CHICAGO, IL 60602-4312UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | adult entertainment services, namely, providing an adult entertainment website featuring photographic, audio and video presentations | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | HSCD | HIDDEN SENSITIVE CONTENT | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | HSCD | HIDDEN SENSITIVE CONTENT | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |